Xem san pham gel titan

Cửa hàng gel Titan Nga chính hãng sản phẩm mới nhất theo lô nhà sản xuất, TITAN GEL chính hãng của NGA sản phẩm hỗ trợ tăng kích thước cậu nhỏ tự . sản phẩm có thể liên hệ trực tiếp để bên cửa hàng tư vấn trực tiếp hoặc xem chi .
Table of contents

Karl Lagerfeld's designer handbags are inspired by a supermarket chain. However, the owners of this item only count on the finger tips because probably no one used the bag several hundred million to store items purchased from the supermarket. With many different sizes, these bags cost up to 30 million. The accessories are decorated with motifs that are "capsules" with an outer layer of PVC. It made a fever when appearing on the springboard of summer Hermes's expensive fashion bag is almost identical to the banana leaf wrappers in Southeast Asia. This post couldn't be written any better!

He always kept talking about this. I will forward this write-up to him. Fairly certain he will have a good read. Thanks for sharing! Great Post buddy. It is well written so i enjoyed it very much. Get stranger chat apps to chat with unknown around the world online for free.

Noi that dep la mot trong nhung phan quan trong de chung ta thiet ke mot phong khach, phong ngu, phong bep dep cho mai am gia dinh cua chung ta tai Ngoi Nha Xinh. It is really great to keep the best player in our team. Good job. Bi quyet de co mot lan da dep va khoe manh khong qua kho khan neu nhu cac ban chu y duong da tuoi day thi that tot. Day la buoc dem de lan da cua ban co mot suc song manh me hon. Meet our bloggers, post comments, or pitch your blog idea. Most recent post: Jake Burger Update: No problem For me, that is the necessary step to begin a scientific revolution.

One more time, thank you for your time, I do enjoy the time I spend 'talking' to you. Best regards Teresa "I don't reject Bell's theorem, I am against local realism" view post as summary. You extended the "or" phrase, but still avoided the "and" phrase from my very first post here: Because of this you still don't understand me and consider me "friennemy".

I gave you links to a view which I consider as local AND as realistic as it can, and still compatible with Bell and KS, and with unitary evolution, and with relativity. It may be It may be not what you want, but you still ignore it. You try to make all of us look like clones of Niels Bohr for some reason: Well, while the links I gave you at the beginning are "as local and realistic as possible", I actually have something that I consider even more local AND realistic.

I mentioned in a comment on FQXi's website a local realistic solution, which I actually don't consider true, but you may want to try it. If you will read my comments on that page and on the related posts chronologically, you will see that I gave full consideration to the one you consider the only local realist alive, but his ideas were so wrong.

I see that you consider theorems of Bell and Kochen-Specker as not being real, because they are "math". The point is, any theorem has three parts, a hypothesis, a proof, and a conclusion. To reject the conclusion, you have to find errors in the proof, or to show that the conditions in the hypothesis don't apply. In the case of QM, the conditions in the hypothesis are fulfilled. And they were not made "a posteriori" as you said. So you should show that the proof is wrong.

In general, the proof is pure logic although the propositions are mathematical , so if you don't find an error, you should to reject logic. Well, in a few hours I will fly to a conference where I will meet a lot of non-standard quantum theorists who have PhD students.

But assuming you are right, this isn't a problem. For my PhD I studied another tabu subject: You see, people want to sell their own theories to replace GR, so they claim that GR is wrong because of singularities, so they don't want them to be fixed. I wanted to show that singularities are not bad, and are actually useful. Even after I succeeded, I had great difficulties because of this, and for two years I tried to find a new supervisor. I eventually found one, after I managed to publish several articles on the subject. Actually, eventually people even liked my results, although they are not very well known yet.

So you see, there may be difficulties, so what? Best regards, Cristi P. I think I will be unavailable the next days, as I mentioned. I will come back, too. See you soon. Hi Teresa, Here is the link to the conference, and I am back. Thank you, thank you, thank you Cristi I followed your conference link and I found what I needed. How was the conference? Tell me Joe Fisher wrote on Sep.

Dear Teresa, I have already rated your video. I do not know why each person is not allowed just to vote one star. That would be more fair than the graduated voting that is allowed. In the essay contest, my essay got perfect 10 ratings from a Physics Professor and two Doctorate Degree certificate holders. Joe Fisher. Hi Joe As I said to Christi, in the last post: Go for it, Physicists! And you are trying, don't give up! You have made your point, in this small community. We have heard you: Real light is the only real stationary substance in the real Universe. And, if anybody has listen to me hehe soon there will be funding for all local realistic research.

Hi Theresa, I can feel you try with all your effort to make a change in physics happen - a science you seem to have a lot passion and dedication for. This is admirable and at times when I struggle with animation, illustration, drawing - things I love - I shall be reminded of the way you pursue your goal. I wish I could plug myself into the actual debate you're involved in and contribute more to the discourse you wish to have - but my knowledge is to limited too join the debate on a satisfactory level. I hope you find the chance to check out our video and tell us what you think.

If you could vote for us it would be really appreciated, since as you mentioned earlier, votes count for all of us and we would like to share support and appreciation. Madeleine Piezoelectricity: A Love Story. Mark Edward Prince wrote on Sep. Hi Theresa, you have got my vote and l look forward to receiving yours for my video http: Who cares? Good luck in the competition!!! Ramona Leigh Taylor wrote on Sep.

Nice video. Interesting points! Jonathan J. Dickau wrote on Sep. I agree with your premise Theresa.. Physics does need a shift, if it is to remain scientific, and maybe it is time for a local realistic revolution. But nobody wants to even try to slay the giant, unless they have a theory in hand, and those who try like Dr.

Geltitannga

Christian get slapped down mighty hard by the QM establishment. I guess I'm saying there will have to be quite compelling reasons to adopt a new view, before the world-view that embraces non-locality and entanglement can be laid to rest. Good luck in your crusade! You are likely to need it. All the Best, Jonathan. Peter Jackson wrote on Sep. Hi Teresa, Top marks, and Especial's proof isn't the only one. I showed in my essay this year how a real local classical mechanism can produce the effects considered as 'non-local', summarised here; Classical reproduction of quantum correlations.

It's achieved just by changing one fundamental assumption inherited by Bell. I hope you'll read it and comment. I'm quite convinced it will contribute to the long overdue paradigm shift, if entrenched academic inertia will now allow any such shifts at all! Best of luck Peter. Hi Peter, I followed your link and found lots of interesting articles to read.

This one https: What I think the fastest way to promote a paradigm shift in Physics is when scientists and deciders of research funds accept that for the quantum phenomena there is a limit - like in Special Relativity there is a limit, the speed of light - and that limit is local realism. That is the importance of recognizing, and not teaching the opposite, in what regards the experimental results of Bell tests.

Don't you think? It was 3 sentences. Thank you, I think I will need a little bit of luck. Teresa, I watched your video and I want to thank you for bringing to my attention the fact that experiments like Aspect's that attempt to disprove the possibility of local realism are subject to loopholes such as Fair Sampling and Measurement Crosstalk. I found J. Especial's paper "Bell inequalities under non-ideal conditions" too technical for me, but I have been "enlightened" on the subject by reading Wikipedia's articles "Loopholes in Bell test experiments", "Local hidden variable theory" and "Superdeterminism".

Of course, the fact that there are loopholes in these experiments do not prove that local realism holds, so entanglement and "spooky action at a distance" are very much still in the running All we can say with certainty is that the jury is still out As Cristinel Stoica pointed in his post on your forum, there will always be physicists who try to imagine new theories, and it is a good thing. We know that, at some point, there will have to be some major shift, since General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics are incompatible.

As we say in french, "Qui vivra verra! Here's the direct link: Adam Katcher wrote on Sep. Hello Teresa, thanks for commenting on our video. Your video is interesting, but I am puzzled about the claim that the experimental verification that local realism is just lore. Are there other experiments that confirm it? Also, great soundtrack! In case you didn't yet, feel free to look up our video, in which we discuss what is quantum gravity, present an existing solution and give examples of applications and future directions: Best, --Pedro.

Hi Pedro are you portuguese? Just saw your video and rated it. There are other theoretical attempts, theorems, but not experimental evidences came out of those theorems. And do you know what happens when, over and over again, an attempt to reject a whole category of theories have been performed and none has successfully achieved it? That means that Local Realism is still a viable alternative to Quantum Mechanics. And you, students have a choice to pursue the path you feel is correct. And talking about quantum gravity Will you debate this between you? I will be here, if you need more information.

Best of luck in the contest.

Schatzie Dudee wrote on Sep. Nice video! You're right - quantum physics is counter-intuitive. Great point! Please rate my 2 videos, if you don't mind so that we can also move on to the next level. Have a great day! Schatzie Dudee. Michael muteru wrote on Sep. Dear maam fantastic video very revolutionary.

Titan gel: cơ chế hoạt động và 10 lý do bạn nên sở hữu nó

Henri Vonn De Roule wrote on Sep. Dear Dr. Thank you for trying to shake up a science that is still in the late 19th century!!! Einstein and most other physicists have been looking at the world in macro terms. The question of the existence of time is becoming more mainstream and as we delve into the quantum world we are finding the "spooky action at a distance" to be the norm. When one delves into the quantum world and leaves behind classical physics it is like leaving the English measuring system and accepting the metric system.

There are still some holdouts there as well. We should tell our students that it is up to them to decide whether the information provided is correct, and if they feel it is not, to pursue the path they feel is correct. Great work!! Hi, Ron I 'm glad you asked. If you want to know if I have a new quantum theory local and realistic for quantum phenomena in my hand? I must say I don't. If you want to know, in my opinion, what is the easier and fastest way to achieve one?

That, I can answer. We are here, today, because of a simple video contest, within one of the most influential physics community We are here, today, because of a simple video contest, within one of the most influential physics community in the world - the FQXi community. Between its members and followers we can find people that, because of their achievements and media attention have this capacity to act as catalysts of one big idea, if there is a consensus to correct an error made in the past.

And this consensus is relatively easy to achieve: If you are a theoretical physicist , from time to time, [ And the crackpot will have a theory about how the world really works. And you feel quite like obliged to maybe read it, because you are funded by a government grant You know it is wrong! You can exclude a whole class of theories! FWXi could promote a serious discussion over J. Especial findings, and take a position over whether or not these new generalizations of Bell inequalities are now correctly formulated.

The conclusion should be transmitted to the whole physics community, both theoretical and experimental.

The result of this action could have a huge impact in the future of Physics. FQXi could promote the idea, that, to correct a 30' year error, a quota for local realistic research funds could be drawn, to encourage new brilliant physicists that are also exquisite mathematicians to use their imagination and skills and present the world new solutions.

Don't you think this could be the beginning of a scientific revolution?

geltitan vn - Ragoon, Mi-an-ma (Miến Điện) | paradigmpartners.com.au

Sincerely Teresa view post as summary. I posted my letter to Prof. Hooft, in almost all your forum areas, and that is against FQXi guidelines. Sorry about that. It is the revolutionary fuss I won't do it again. I wish we had a forum for all of us to post and be notified by mail. Why not Local Realism?

Because it was reported as incorrect, all posts were deleted, including the comments. Even the one I wrote here. The news is: I got an answer from Prof. Are you interested in following this discussion? I can't publish his comments, without his authorization, of course, but I can post my answers. Should I post them here? Will anybody see them? I'm still here, fighting for a scientific revolution, I'm not going anywhere. Dickau replied on Sep. Yes I'm interested.. In general Teresa, it is OK to reprint comments made by scientists in correspondence, if they are topical concerning local realism in this case or general rather than personal in nature - so long as it is cited as coming from personal correspondence and not treated as though it was published work.

So stating something like; "in his reply Gerard said For the record; the initial 't' is not capitalized, and when pronounced his name has a leading vowel - so it sounds like ut Hooft, rather than tuh Hooft. If it seems OK given the above criteria, bring it on, or share a few excerpts you think are worthwhile to repeat. I am hoping you will have time to rate and comment on my video..


  • male enhancement pills blue diamond?
  • Post navigation;
  • titan gel in pakistan price.

Can the Mandelbrot Set help us understand the Cosmos? Regards, Jonathan. Thanks Teresa, For the kind remarks left on my comments page. You would like my companion Music Video: Hi Jonathan I love when people take the time to explain newcomers the "rules". I wish we had a place to "talk", not in "my" forum or "your" forum so that we both could be notified by mail. So here is my answer to Gerard hehe when he said, in a mail to me 23Sept14, "Dear Teresa, Thank you for your mail.

I understand your point but I don't quite agree with I understand your point but I don't quite agree with it. I realise that photons cannot be detected with absolute accuracy and reliability, but the question is whether this is a sufficiently essential element of quantum mechanics to explain the apparent violations of the Bell inequality.

Lợi thế của "Titan Gel" là gì?

Please let me restate my point regarding photon detection efficiency to make it as clear as I possibly can. Is this not evidence of a prediction of QT that is not confirmed by experimental evidence? All this talk about quantum detection efficiencies may seem, at first sight, too much attention over a minor detail.

Join Free. Tag gel titan 2. Your new post is loading Scooped by TitanGel. From www. No comment yet. TitanGel's insight:. From plus. From news. From titangel. From sites. Org -. From about. Read my articles. From suckhoedoisong. Powered by Scoop. How do I publish content on my topic?