Địa chỉ bán Gel Titan ở TPHCM và Hà Nội Gel Titan Là Gì Và Titan Gel Giá Bao Nhiêu Tại sao mọi người nói Gel Titan Nga là lừa đảo, và đây là lý do.
Table of contents
I have been surfing on-line more than 3 hours nowadays, yet I never found any fascinating article like yours. It is pretty price enough for me. In my view, if all site owners and bloggers made just right content material as you did, the net shall be much more helpful than ever before.
Ahaa, its pleasant conversation on the topic of this paragraph at this place at this blog, I have read all that, so at this time me also commenting here. I am sure this paragraph has touched all the internet users, its really really nice paragraph on building up new web site. Wow, this article is good, my younger sister is analyzing these things, so I am going to tell her. Way cool! Some extremely valid points! I appreciate you writing this article and also the rest of the site is really good. Hi, I do think this is an excellent site.
I stumbledupon it ; I may return yet again since i have bookmarked it. Money and freedom is the greatest way to change, may you be rich and continue to help others. It's simple, yet effective. A lot of times it's very hard to get that "perfect balance" between user friendliness and visual appearance. I must say that you've done a excellent job with this.
In addition, the blog loads very fast for me on Opera. Outstanding Blog! These are actually fantastic ideas in about blogging. You have touched some fastidious points here. Any way keep up wrinting. I love what you guys tend to be up too. This kind of clever work and coverage! Keep up the very good works guys I've included you guys to our blogroll. Someone in my Facebook group shared this site with us so I came to give it a look.
I'm definitely enjoying the information. I'm book-marking and will be tweeting this to my followers! Fantastic blog and great design and style. Everyone loves what you guys are up too. Such clever work and coverage! Keep up the amazing works guys I've included you guys to my personal blogroll.
Hello would you mind stating which blog platform you're using? The reason I ask is because your design seems different then most blogs and I'm looking for something unique. S Apologies for being off-topic but I had to ask! Howdy would you mind letting me know which hosting company you're utilizing? I've loaded your blog in 3 different web browsers and I must say this blog loads a lot faster then most. Can you recommend a good hosting provider at a fair price? Cheers, I appreciate it! I like it whenever people get together and share ideas. Great website, keep it up!
Thank you for the good writeup. It in fact was a amusement account it. Look advanced to more added agreeable from you! However, how can we communicate? Hello just wanted to give you a quick heads up. The words in your content seem to be running off the screen in Safari. I'm not sure if this is a format issue or something to do with browser compatibility but I thought I'd post to let you know. The style and design look great though! Hope you get the issue resolved soon. Cheers This is a topic that is close to my heart Thank you! Exactly where are your contact details though?
It's very straightforward to find out any topic on web as compared to books, as I found this article at this web site. Does your website have a contact page? I'm having problems locating it but, I'd like to send you an e-mail. I've got some recommendations for your blog you might be interested in hearing. Either way, great site and I look forward to seeing it grow over time. I've been following your blog for a long time now and finally got the courage to go ahead and give you a shout out from Houston Texas! Just wanted to mention keep up the good work!
Greetings from Carolina! I'm bored to tears at work so I decided to browse your website on my iphone during lunch break. I enjoy the information you provide here and can't wait to take a look when I get home. I'm surprised at how quick your blog loaded on my phone.. Anyhow, fantastic blog! Its like you read my mind!
You appear to grasp a lot approximately this, like you wrote the book in it or something. I think that you simply can do with some percent to force the message house a little bit, however instead of that, that is great blog. A fantastic read. I'll certainly be back. I visited various web pages however the audio feature for audio songs present at this web page is in fact wonderful. Hi there, i read your blog occasionally and i own a similar one and i was just curious if you get a lot of spam comments?
If so how do you prevent it, any plugin or anything you can advise? I get so much lately it's driving me crazy so any support is very much appreciated. Very useful advice within this post! It is the little changes that produce the greatest changes. Thanks for sharing! I absolutely love your site.. Did you make this site yourself?
Please reply back as I'm wanting to create my own blog and want to know where you got this from or exactly what the theme is called. This post couldn't be written much better! Going through this article reminds me of my previous roommate! He constantly kept talking about this. I will forward this article to him.
Pretty sure he will have a great read. Thank you for sharing! This blog looks just like my old one! It's on a entirely different subject but it has pretty much the same layout and design. Great choice of colors! There's certainly a lot to know about this topic. I like all the points you've made. You've made some really good points there.
I looked on the web for more information about the issue and found most people will go along with your views on this website. Hi, I log on to your blogs regularly. Your humoristic style is awesome, keep up the good work! I simply couldn't go away your website before suggesting that I really enjoyed the usual information a person provide to your visitors?
Is gonna be back steadily to inspect new posts I wanted to thank you for this great read!! I definitely enjoyed every little bit of it. I have you book marked to look at new stuff you post… What's up, just wanted to tell you, I enjoyed this post. It was inspiring. Keep on posting!
Hi there, I enjoy reading all of your post. I like to write a little comment to support you. I every time spent my half an hour to read this blog's articles or reviews everyday along with a cup of coffee. I for all time emailed this web site post page to all my associates, for the reason that if like to read it afterward my contacts will too. My developer is trying to convince me to move to. I have always disliked the idea because of the expenses. But he's tryiong none the less. I've been using Movable-type on a number of websites for about a year and am concerned about switching to another platform.
I have heard great things about blogengine. Is there a way I can import all my wordpress content into it? Any kind of help would be greatly appreciated! Hello there! I could have sworn I've been to this blog before but after going through a few of the posts I realized it's new to me. Anyways, I'm certainly happy I stumbled upon it and I'll be book-marking it and checking back frequently! Terrific article! This is the kind of information that should be shared across the internet.
Shame on the search engines for not positioning this publish upper! Come on over and discuss with my web site. I hope to give something back and help others like you helped me. Hello there, There's no doubt that your website may be having browser compatibility issues. Whenever I look at your website in Safari, it looks fine however, if opening in IE, it's got some overlapping issues. I merely wanted to give you a quick heads up! Aside from that, great site! Somebody essentially assist to make critically posts I might state.
That is the first time I frequented your web page and so far? I surprised with the research you made to make this actual put up incredible. Fantastic job! Heya i'm for the primary time here. I hope to offer one thing back and aid others such as you aided me.
- titan gel especial transferencias.
- gel titan mua o dau gia bao nhieu!
- Titan gel gia bao nhieu roi?
Good day! I just wish to give you a big thumbs up for the excellent info you have got here on this post. I'll be returning to your site for more soon. I every time used to study post in news papers but now as I am a user of internet so from now I am using net for content, thanks to web. Your way of explaining everything in this article is actually nice, every one be capable of easily understand it, Thanks a lot. Hi there, I found your web site via Google whilst looking for a related topic, your website came up, it appears great. I have bookmarked it in my google bookmarks.
Hello there, just turned into alert to your blog via Google, and located that it's really informative. I'm gonna watch out for brussels. I'll appreciate should you proceed this in future. A lot of folks shall be benefited out of your writing. I'm curious to find out what blog platform you're using? I'm experiencing some minor security issues with my latest site and I would like to find something more secure.
Do you have any solutions? I'm extremely impressed with your writing skills and also with the layout on your weblog. Is this a paid theme or did you customize it yourself? Anyway keep up the nice quality writing, it's rare to see a great blog like this one these days. I'm really impressed with your writing abilities and also with the layout for your blog. Is this a paid subject or did you customize it yourself? Anyway keep up the nice high quality writing, it is rare to see a great blog like this one nowadays.. Hello, Neat post. There's an issue with your site in web explorer, may check this?
Quantum Rotation and Relative Time". Furthermore, I have recently proposed some straightforward experiments that should directly address some issues in superposition and entanglement: Best wishes for your success in this FQXi contest. Long Live the Scientific Revolution! Teresa Mendes replied on Aug.
Hi Alan, Thank you for your very nice comment on my video I will look at your essays, of course, as you could also have a look at Especial, Bell inequalities under non-ideal conditions As you say in your article "Rise and Fall Mainstream physicist won't agree with you because they are told that all Local-Realistic theories have been rejected experimentally with the Bell experiments.
The point J. Especial makes is: This is the first step for the change in Physics. The second, could be yours: When are you planning to do it? Let's keep talking, ok? Sincerely Teresa. Michio Kaku 2. He called it Spooky Action at a Distance. We do this every day, in the laboratory. Here is how it works: As you separate these coherent particles an umbilical cord, an invisible umbilical cord, starts to develop between these two particles, such as, if you wiggle one particle, then the other particle is aware of the fact that its partner is being wiggled.
So here, at one end of the galaxy we wiggle an electron and on the other side of the galaxy, Now, Einstein said: But this effect has been measured! If a loophole free test shows a true Bell violation this will tell us something very profound about the Universe. Entanglement would mean that particles could be connected across time and space and events could be correlated without anything causing them. Do you understand what they mean? That is what he did: Especial, J. Bell inequalities under non-ideal conditions Give our kids a break! Teresa Mendes wrote on Sep.
To Scot Aaronson: Scott, we already "talked" on the possibility or not of having a scalable quantum computer in the future. To convince you, you defied me to convince the majority of the Physics Community. Here I am, doing my best. I have tried to reach you since then Will now be a good opportunity?
Don't you want to, as a last grand effort, join this revolution? Your presence would be highly appreciated. Your voice is much louder than mine To Lee Smolin You once wrote "I am convinced that quantum mechanics is not a final theory. I believe this because I have never encountered an interpretation of the present formulation of quantum mechanics that makes sense to me" I also read your "O romper das Cordas" book, in portuguese. I could completely put myself in our shoes.
We both could point to an error in the foundations of a theory yours being the String Theory, mine, Quantum Mechanics and not many people are willing to listen. Should we join forces? To Joy Christian Joy Cristian, you are a local realist. But we differ on our arguments: And that is why local realism has not been experimentally rejected. Can you take the time, and are you humble enough, to have a serious look at this argument and, perhaps, overcome some of the "anti-bodys" other physicists have towards your ideas?
You are a local realist! Your heart is already on the right place. To Max Tegmark Max, you are a founder of FQXi, an Institute that "catalyzes, supports, and disseminates research on questions at the foundations of physics and cosmology, particularly new frontiers and innovative ideas integral to a deep understanding of reality, but unlikely to be supported by conventional funding sources" Thank you. As a non-physicist this was the first time I "dare" to appear in front of a scientific community defending new frontiers.
As a portuguese person, I believe in the success of pacific revolutions. Have you heard how Portugal did a political revolution, "with flowers", from a dictatorial regime to democracy in ? I was a teenager then. I have lived through one revolution. I'm willing to pursue another. Would you be so kind, to do another easy experiment?
Can you ask your pollers to read J. Especial article, already published in a peer reviewed magazine in , arXiv: If there is no significant change I will pay you a lunch in the best portuguese restaurant in Lisbon. Today, as Dean of Physics Department in Sevilla University, you did a pages comprehensive essay "Bibliographic guide to the foundations of quantum mechanics and quantum information".
I'm sure, any post-graduate student interested in the foundations of Physics, Teleportation or Quantum computation welcomed your article. Can you please be so kind to include J. Especial article in your session I: F Bell Inequalities? I'm sure, once you read it and acknowledge its scientific implications , you will find a place to put in your guide an article that concludes that there is no experimental evidence of the rejection of the the whole category of local realistic theories.
Sincerely, Teresa view post as summary. Matthew Marsden wrote on Sep. Hi Teresa, Thanks for your comments re voting, please don't just give mine a "5", but whatever you genuinely think each deserves.
Yeah :-) Just one more step!
Also all the participants could send a few group emails, twitter, facebook, msgs to interested friends perhaps? I seriously think seeing how the theory of time may be completely unfounded, and showing how Special relativity probably does not infact prove time, or time dilation, but only rate dilation, may be a very big part of the paradigm shift - a lot of possibly wasted thought and effort is going into trying to work out what "time" "is", and yet we don't see any proof of anything other than the fact matter exists and is changing.
How 'Time travel Paradoxes' can't happen without "the past". Vad S Bobrovski wrote on Sep. Hi, good act of self-action is our opportunity to set forth. Best, Vad. Thank you I am doing my best! With all my heart! Hi Teresa Making a plea to change a prevailing theory of physics whether it is referred to as a revolution of paradigm change is a reasonable aspiration on your part. However, Karl Popper whose picture is in your video would encourage you and all of us to apply the principle of falsifiability to achieve such goals.
You or some other physicist will simply need to come up with experimental results that support your theory of choice. If you are correct, it will happen. They will do it on the basis of the merits of the experiment. Ron Gruber. Hi Ronald, Thank you for your comments. I think we are saying the same thing. A theory, to prevail, needs to be falsifiable. There has to be a test, an experimental test, that allow us to refute it and if refuted, discard it. That is the case. Bell experiments are the only experiments that aim the refutation of all possible local realistic theory ies. Accordingly to Popper, we can not prove Bell proposed a theorem, and, when laser technology allowed, in late '70, experiments began being made.
For more than 40 years, they have been performed, with different experimental apparatus, and accordingly to J. Especial none has been able to reject local realism. Those who are not familiar yet with J. Especial's work, know that the all experiments have been performed with 'loopholes' and that there is not, at this time, any experiment that has closed all 'loopholes' in one experiment. Don't you agree that it means that local realism, was not experimentally rejected? So why do teachers, renown physicists and all media say the opposite? Don't you thing that this could be the reason there is so little funding and credibility for any local realist research for a new local realistic theory for quantum phenomena?
This theory does not, yet, exists, to be tested. I think because no one is looking for it. But once proposed, I agree with you, it has to be falsifiable too, and a test has to be proposed and performed. The purpose of my plea is not for others to agree with me Local realism has NOT been rejected. Don't you agree? Cristinel Stoica wrote on Sep. Hi Teresa, I've watched your manifesto for questioning the foundations of quantum mechanics, and for searching a local realistic solution. I can't imagine a principle in physics which we should stop questioning. Principles are universal propositions, and they can be tested only in a finite number of situations, so we should never consider them proven forever, and stop testing them.
Especially when they come with trouble. You commented on my video The puzzle of quantum reality , which contains an interpretation of quantum mechanics that gives, in my opinion, the closest thing to local realism we can get, and in the same time relies entirely on the standard formalism of quantum mechanics.
Briefly, my view is that any measurement setup in QM has local real solutions. The solution can be local, being a solution to Schrodinger's equation, but when we ask it to also be global, in the sense that it has to be extendible to the entire spacetime, the correlations follow. The solution is real at any time, but depends also by the future measurements contextuality, "delayed initial conditions". This is better understood in the block world picture given by relativity, and in this case is just a particular case of 1. I tried to explain how this works in my video , and in the above mentioned essays.
And in this video. Best regards, Cristi. Hi Cristi, Thank you for your comment and probably for your vote. I have a question for you: You said you have "an interpretation of quantum mechanics that gives, in my opinion, the closest thing to local realism we can get, and in the same time relies entirely on the standard formalism of quantum mechanics. A new paradigm means, not only a new mindset, but also a new formalism, that of course should be compatible with all previous experimental evidence, and be falsifiable, but also bring something new.
Kuhn pointed out accuracy, consistency, scope, simplicity and fruitfulness as the rational aspects two competing theories would be compared upon. My question, now: If you agree that "any measurement setup has local real solutions" why do you think you have to restrict yourself to the quantum mechanics formalism? Can't you begin from scratch and invent a new solution? Much more easy to say it than do it, right? But Go for It, Physicists!! Change the paradigm! Best regards Teresa. Cristinel Stoica replied on Sep.
Hi Teresa, "don't you think that the two phrases are in contradiction? To see that they are not in contradiction, you can check the links I gave you. Hence, you can only see the time displayed on the screen, so you think Hence, you can only see the time displayed on the screen, so you think that it is just a clock. But you would like to have a cell phone. You are prepared to toss this clock and buy a cell phone. Say that accidentally you discover how to unlock the screen, and use it as a phone. You realize that what you thought is a clock, it is in fact a smartphone. Would you still find justified to toss it and buy a cell phone?
But since up to this point the boundaries of the experiments are precisely those of the theory, then I don't think I am restricting myself. There are a lot of great physicists who work in the foundations of quantum mechanics and try to reconstruct it from different principles and using different formalisms. Up to this point, their reconstructions either don't fit the data give different inequalities , or are complicated by adding new axioms to make them reproduce the same data as QM.
But if you follow them, you can see that they have brilliant, radically new ideas, based on new paradigms and so on. Whatever you ask for. And there are so many physicists working at local or realistic versions of QM. Your manifesto comes a bit late, because there are already so many trying to do this. Perhaps you are not satisfied with their work, but did you read it? I think even the smartest guys barely have enough time to read and understand all that is written every day on this subject. Up to this point, there were proposed hundreds of alternative formulations and formalisms of QM, but the simplest and most fit is the Hilbert space formalism.
It is not that people don't try to solve these puzzles, they do. The one you should convince seems to be not them, but Nature. Nature doesn't seem to care about our taste. You say that all experiments testing Bell's theorem have loopholes. This is an overstatement. To exploit those loopholes, Nature would have to be very sneaky, and to do this at purpose, and change the way to use the loopholes in different ways, depending on the experiment. So either nature violates Bell's inequalities, or obeys them using various complicated improvisations a la Rube Goldberg.
But anyway, say that testing Bell's theorem is not perfect so it must be wrong. How about the Kochen-Specker theorem? This doesn't even need an experiment to test it. It proves that QM is contextual. Also, are you aware that there are versions of Bell's theorem without inequalities? I doubt you can find loopholes based on imperfect measurements here.
So this is why I don't think I should toss the good old formalism. But please read my papers and watch my videos, where I try to explain why the old formalism still allows things considered forbidden by most scientists: In a similar vein, people don't like singularities in GR and come with radically new theories. But when singularities are understood, we see that not only they are not bad, but they are even helpful my other video is about this. So I don't think physics lacks revolutionary ideas and new paradigms. Every day you will find on arxiv a new revolution, a new paradigm.
The problem is that there are some that always win, when the math is checked, or when the experiments are performed. And that's why it seems that physicist are so short sighted and can't replace them with better ones: It doesn't mean that in the future we will not realize that something radically new is better, but this day is not today.
Cristi view post as summary. Hi Christi Thank you for answering. You say: So let me rephrase: What I think the fastest way to promote a paradigm shift in Physics is when scientists and deciders of research funds accept that for the quantum phenomena there is a limit - like in Special Relativity there is a limit, nothing goes faster than the speed of light - and that limit is Local Realism. Because local realism has not been rejected, Physicists should FIRST find a solution within that limitation, and not search for that solution all over the place. Can I ask you something?
It makes any sense for you, the claim J. Especial made, that in Bell tests under non-ideal detection, the respective inequalities, all, confused Fair Sampling with Perfect Correlation between Contrafactual Detections? Looking forward for your answer Teresa. Hi Teresa, I see you emphasize the "or" in my phrase about the other approaches to QM, but you ignore the "and" in the phrase in which I discuss my own approach. It is difficult to judge someone's work only by a one sentence summary.
But I understand that nobody can actually read carefully everything that is written. I wish you good luck with the paradigm shift which you promote, which is to replace the current paradigm in QM with a new one, which is actually the old one of local realism. On the other hand, you can probably see that there are many physicists still trying to find some local realistic approach to QM, but so far this didn't lead to significant progress. On the other hand, the others are the ones that advanced QM, both in theory and in applications.
This doesn't mean that I consider them right, but only practical. I see that you consider that, because I don't reject Bell's theorem, I am against local realism. But I think this would be unfair, and I gave you some links that may help you understand my position, if you will be interested and decide to spend some time on this. On the other hand, why wouldn't you find that new local realistic approach to QM which really is what you want? I wish you good luck in your mission. Hi Cristi Glad you answered but didn't answered my question When I commented on just one of your sentences, you should not think I didn't read all your post.
I appreciated it, and also the amount of time you have put on it. The "or" phrase. That was the phrase that mostly "interested" me.
- Info-titan-gel-vn.com biet doi titan gel;
- geltitanvn;
- Titan Gel Gold: mua kem tăng kích thước dương vật từ Hendel’s Garden.
- Làm thế nào để sử dụng một cách an toàn Gel Titan? Chống chỉ định.
Exactly because the "or" part. The "or" is the part that The "or" is the part that shows that today' physicists think that Local Realism, was experimentally rejected. After all, that is what they have been told in school. And those are the "aceptable" alternatives. You see why the "or" was so important?
As I see it, that is a big problem Am I wrong? Math is Math, a cool science - the only exact science we have. But you do need experiments to test what makes sense in the real world. Physics is not an exact science, you always need to test your hypotesis with an experiment. Math is a tool. Math is not "the truth", and everything that math "says" doesn't necessarily have to be real. Because it is so counter-intuitive one have to rely of math to find the "truth". And it leads to completely exaggerated new hypothesis Is there another test to disprove Local Realism?
Teleportation and Quantum computer experimentalists: They have to do something to test it - they do a Bell test. Bell theorem, is ok. Every physicist except Dr. Christian and al. It is math. It uses inequalities to find the limits of Local Realism. The problem with the Bell tests is with the "transformed" Bell inequalities that have to be used to a particular experiment.
That is the reason why I made you my important question.
I really don't care about "loopholes" but mainstream physicists do, and they teach the opposite. I want the world to have a local realist theory to explain quantum phenomena, that could make predictions in a broader scope than QM, for instance Gravity. I want a theory that is consistent with all other sciences, from Chemistry my area to Cosmology.
I want a theory that can be used by engineers to develop new technologies, create value, and help the world to overcome this awful economic crisis. I also want a theory that is as accurate as QM in its prediction.. And also I want a theory whose formalist that doesn't need to be renormalized to give predictions. Can I find it? Not alone, I can't. But, what I believe, is that J. Especial found and put the finger where the problem of today's Physics is. And no one, or very few, are looking where the solution might be. I want more. More physicists looking for that solution.
I can't convince you.. No problem For me, that is the necessary step to begin a scientific revolution. One more time, thank you for your time, I do enjoy the time I spend 'talking' to you. Best regards Teresa "I don't reject Bell's theorem, I am against local realism" view post as summary. You extended the "or" phrase, but still avoided the "and" phrase from my very first post here: Because of this you still don't understand me and consider me "friennemy".
I gave you links to a view which I consider as local AND as realistic as it can, and still compatible with Bell and KS, and with unitary evolution, and with relativity. It may be It may be not what you want, but you still ignore it. You try to make all of us look like clones of Niels Bohr for some reason: Well, while the links I gave you at the beginning are "as local and realistic as possible", I actually have something that I consider even more local AND realistic.
I mentioned in a comment on FQXi's website a local realistic solution, which I actually don't consider true, but you may want to try it. If you will read my comments on that page and on the related posts chronologically, you will see that I gave full consideration to the one you consider the only local realist alive, but his ideas were so wrong. I see that you consider theorems of Bell and Kochen-Specker as not being real, because they are "math".
The point is, any theorem has three parts, a hypothesis, a proof, and a conclusion. To reject the conclusion, you have to find errors in the proof, or to show that the conditions in the hypothesis don't apply. In the case of QM, the conditions in the hypothesis are fulfilled. And they were not made "a posteriori" as you said. So you should show that the proof is wrong. In general, the proof is pure logic although the propositions are mathematical , so if you don't find an error, you should to reject logic.
Well, in a few hours I will fly to a conference where I will meet a lot of non-standard quantum theorists who have PhD students. But assuming you are right, this isn't a problem. For my PhD I studied another tabu subject: You see, people want to sell their own theories to replace GR, so they claim that GR is wrong because of singularities, so they don't want them to be fixed. I wanted to show that singularities are not bad, and are actually useful. Even after I succeeded, I had great difficulties because of this, and for two years I tried to find a new supervisor.
I eventually found one, after I managed to publish several articles on the subject. Actually, eventually people even liked my results, although they are not very well known yet. So you see, there may be difficulties, so what? Best regards, Cristi P. I think I will be unavailable the next days, as I mentioned.
Titan Gel là gì - tăng kích cỡ dương vật 2018
I will come back, too. See you soon. Hi Teresa, Here is the link to the conference, and I am back. Thank you, thank you, thank you Cristi I followed your conference link and I found what I needed. How was the conference? Tell me Joe Fisher wrote on Sep.
Cách Sử dụng Gel Titan
Dear Teresa, I have already rated your video. I do not know why each person is not allowed just to vote one star. That would be more fair than the graduated voting that is allowed. In the essay contest, my essay got perfect 10 ratings from a Physics Professor and two Doctorate Degree certificate holders. Joe Fisher. Hi Joe As I said to Christi, in the last post: Go for it, Physicists!